<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">I have a VMS 4.7 instance with CMU-TEK TCP/IP on it - telnet, smtp etc work fine but I am missing a http server. Is there a http server in source or binary form that would run in this environment?<br><br><div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr"><div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">---</span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Supratim Sanyal, W1XMT</span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">39.19151 N, 77.23432 W</span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">QCOCAL::SANYAL via <a href="http://www.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet.html">HECnet</a></span></div></div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><br>On Jun 28, 2019, at 10:03 PM, Dave McGuire <<a href="mailto:mcguire@neurotica.com">mcguire@neurotica.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><span>On 6/28/19 6:40 PM, Keith Halewood wrote:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>Multinet’s network interface is a bit of a mish-mash for my mind. I have</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>a recollection of using CMUTEK TCP/IP under VAX/VMS several ‘centuries’</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>ago and that was a pure $QIO(W)-based interface, wonderfully</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>straightforward. Multinet offers a $QIO interface… and then ruins it by</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>insisting on socket-like data structures for establishing connections –</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>yuck.</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span> I've noticed this as well. While I love that we have Multinet, I do</span><br><span>have pretty fond memories of CMU-TEK IP and its more "VMS-like" API. I</span><br><span>ran CMU-TEK at a US Gov't-related facility under VMS 5.1 and 5.5 when I</span><br><span>was a VMS admin a very long time ago. It worked great and the API was good.</span><br><span></span><br><span> Multinet is ok, but the whole thing just appears to be a port of a BSD</span><br><span>UNIX network stack and all of the relevant applications to VMS. I've</span><br><span>not looked under the hood (I install Multinet on the machines at the</span><br><span>museum to ssh and ftp around, not to dig into its internals) but it sure</span><br><span>looks that way. While I'm fine with that approach in general, and I'm a</span><br><span>dyed-in-the-wool UNIX guy, it really doesn't feel very "VMSy" to me.</span><br><span></span><br><span> -Dave</span><br><span></span><br><span>-- </span><br><span>Dave McGuire, AK4HZ</span><br><span>New Kensington, PA</span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>