<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Then I think I got a false negative from the 36 bit DECnet 'ping'
utility.<br>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt><span style="font-size:10.0pt">NETPTH><b>venti</b></span></tt><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""><br>
<br>
<tt>[Routing path from VENTI2 (2.522) to VENTI (2.20)]</tt><br>
<br>
<tt> From Via Back Thru
Cost Hops</tt><br>
<tt>VENTI2 (2.522) =>NI-0-0 /BRG-0 <= A2RTR
(2.1023) 5 2</tt><br>
<tt>A2RTR (2.1023) =>DUP-1 /KDP-0-0 <= VENTI
(2.20) -1 -1</tt><br>
<br>
<tt>NETPTH><b>mim</b></tt><br>
<br>
<tt>[Routing path from VENTI2 (2.522) to MIM (1.13)]</tt><br>
<br>
<tt> From Via Back Thru
Cost Hops</tt><br>
<tt>VENTI2 (2.522) =>NI-0-0 /BRG-0 <= A2RTR
(2.1023) -1 -1</tt><br>
<tt>A2RTR (2.1023) =>MUL-1 / </tt><br>
<tt><span style="color:red">?NETPTH NTMAN failed, reason:</span></tt><span
style="color:red"><br>
<tt>Parameter missing</tt></span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I immediately tested with the node
fetch batch job and it worked fine:</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4"><tt>10:38:42 USER
MIM::DU1:[DECNET]</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>10:38:42 USER FIX.T20;122;P775656 17
33280(8) 21-Nov-2021 23:00:10</tt><tt><br>
</tt></font><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/22/21 11:02 AM, Johnny Billquist
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:bdf76034-43b9-c0cb-bd29-46c88fef5f17@softjar.se">Hi. MIM
will continue to be the source. And now Mim.Update.UU.SE is a
CNAME to Mim.Stupi.NET, so hopefully nothing needs to change
anywhere.
<br>
<br>
Johnny
<br>
<br>
On 2021-11-22 16:58, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Johhny,
<br>
<br>
Will MIM continue to be the online source of record for the
T20.CMD node list? Or should I go elsewhere to fetch it?
<br>
<br>
--T
<br>
<br>
On 11/22/21 10:52 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 2021-11-22 16:51, Robert Armstrong
wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Peter Lothberg
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:roll@stupi.com"><roll@stupi.com></a> wrote:
<br>
hecnet-1023, 192.108.202.70 is UP but I drop all packets
towards it that
<br>
are not HECnet tunnels in one or the other form..
(linux.....)
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Did you include Multinet in your rules?
<br>
<br>
A2RTR used to have a Multinet tunnel to MIM (Johnny's RSX
TCP/IP stack supports that), and when I change it to
<br>
<br>
circuit MUL-1 Multinet
hecnet-1-1023.stupi.net:700:connect --cost=12
<br>
<br>
it doesn't connect. FWIW, the previous connection was
<br>
<br>
#circuit MUL-1 Multinet mim.update.uu.se:700:connect
--cost=12
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sorry, that would be my fault. I saw that Peter had some
comments about links to you in the config, so I didn't do
anything. Let me set you up as with Mim before then, but to
hecnet-1-1023. In a sec...
<br>
<br>
Johnny
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>