[HECnet] Multinet Tunnel Connections to SG1::

Johnny Billquist bqt at softjar.se
Thu Jun 7 18:27:01 PDT 2012


On 2012-06-07 19:18, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:

On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Mark Benson wrote:

...
We established that, yes. That's where my idea of using pcap and
running the interface in promicuous mode came out of.

Why promiscuous?   So long as you can get the DECnet style individual address delivered, and the multicast addresses that DECnet would register, I don't see a need for promiscuous mode.

Right. There is only need for promiscous mode if you sit on an interface with the "wrong" MAC address.

However, if you want to have your DECnet stack portable, you will need to go down that path, as some Unixes don't have a way to change the MAC address of an interface at all.

Also, to comment on your previous post, Paul.
Correct, the API of the current Linux DECnet is not possible to adopt to a new user-level DECnet implementation, as they use explicit system calls, and you can't siphon those off.
Had it all been done through a decnet library, it would have been easier. But the current Linux solution is (I think) similar to the Ultrix one. And it do make sense from a pure interface point of view.

	Johnny



More information about the Hecnet-list mailing list