[HECnet] Cisco tunnels: update my IP

[Brian Hechinger]

What sort of connection do you have?

-brian

> On Jun 23, 2016, at 10:55, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
> 
> ...it also exceeds the capabilities of a 2851.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 07:26, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>> 
>> My connection exceeds the capabilities of the 2620 or I would.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 05:30, Peter Lothberg <roll at Stupi.SE> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Why don't you put your 2600 as your boarder-gw? 
>>> 
>>> interface Tunnel1
>>> ip address 192.108.195.70 255.255.255.252
>>> ip router isis
>>> ipv6 address 2001:440:1880:ABCD::2/64
>>> ipv6 enable
>>> ipv6 mtu 1420
>>> ipv6 router isis
>>> decnet cost 1
>>> isis metric 2
>>> tunnel source ATM0/1/0.1
>>> tunnel destination 192.36.147.120
>>> !
>>> interface ATM0/1/0
>>> mtu 4470
>>> no ip address
>>> ip virtual-reassembly in max-fragments 64 max-reassemblies 512
>>> load-interval 30
>>> atm restart timer 90
>>> no atm ilmi-keepalive
>>> dsl enable-training-log delay 0
>>> dsl power-cutback 6
>>> dsl noise-margin -2
>>> dsl gain-setting rx-offset 3
>>> dsl bitswap both
>>> !
>>> interface ATM0/1/0.1 point-to-point
>>> mtu 4470
>>> ip dhcp client broadcast-flag set
>>> ip address dhcp
>>> ip nat outside
>>> ip virtual-reassembly in
>>> atm route-bridged ip
>>> pvc 0/35
>>> protocol bridge
>>> encapsulation aal5snap
>>> 
>>> -P
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> On 23/06/2016 1:47 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
>>>>> Found the actual problem!
>>>>> 
>>>>> IPSec VTI VPNs means I can't do source-based NAT/firewall rules to redirect GRE from the DECnet tunnel IPs to a separate box as is currently configured.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> So, does this mean that you're still off the air?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards, Tim.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> `
>> 
>