[HECnet] Connections?
Johnny Billquist
bqt at softjar.se
Mon Apr 30 14:12:15 PDT 2018
On that topic, why would you be generating code? It's just a config file
that needs changing, and then a signal sent to the process. (For the
bridge).
For multinet, it essentially would be a couple of configuration commands
under VMS or RSX. I don't get the "output 'C'" comment at all.
Johnny
On 2018-04-30 01:02, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> I can and that would probably be my fall back option.
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 18:45 Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net
> <mailto:steve at davidson.net>> wrote:
>
> Can you output "C"?
>
> -Steve Davidson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 29, 2018, at 15:48, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
> <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
> >
> > I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't think I'd be
> interested in any kind of automation like that for my systems. I
> prefer to know explicitly what I have.
> >
> > Johnny
> >
> >> On 2018-04-29 21:20, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> >> Would anyone be interested in some manner of automation for this
> similar to what I do for the cisco tunnels?
> >> Re-writing that in Go has been on my short list for a while now.
> Mayne now is the time to look to expanding it as well.
> >> One of the things I was going to add was a web front end so you
> can all manage your own endpoints.
> >> The bridge will be easy, I can write an agent that can run there
> to manage it as those are all unix boxes and so I should be able to
> generate binaries for that.
> >> Multinet may be a tad trickier since Go doesn’t generate
> binaries for VMS/RSX/etc so I may have to pick something else there.
> Not sure what I’d do.
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -brian
> >>> On Apr 29, 2018, at 1:54 PM, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net
> <mailto:steve at davidson.net>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I can do eastern US like I did the bridge. I have to finish
> the Tex build though...
> >>>
> >>> -Steve Davidson
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>> On Apr 29, 2018, at 12:23, Jeroen Brons
> <idiotoflinux at gmail.com <mailto:idiotoflinux at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> i''m Also in the Netherlands, but because of my ISP my IP isnt
> exactly static (although it stays the same most of the time...), and
> as it's running at home im willing to run a bridge but i cannot
> guarantee uptime
> >>>>> Op 29 apr. 2018, om 18:19 heeft Hans Vlems <hvlems at zonnet.nl
> <mailto:hvlems at zonnet.nl>> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Johnny
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My connection to Hecnet is thru your site with your bridge
> program. It runs on a Fedora (17) system that also hosts A44RTR.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> None of my systems run Multinet, and A44RTR runs VAX/VMS V7.3
> and DECnet phase IV. It may be converted to run phase V if that
> would help you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My internet connection is ADSL2+ which translates to 11 Mb/s
> downstream and less than 400 kb/s upstream. Not bloody useful as a
> hub, then again Netherlands is not exactly in southern Europe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hans
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Op 29 apr. 2018 om 17:52 heeft Johnny Billquist
> <bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> het volgende geschreven:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Guys. I figure I should try to get a more formalized
> handling of connections to HECnet.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With my bridge, it's mostly just people connecting to me,
> but this is not a solution that scales very well, so in general I
> now try to discourage people from this option. When possible, I
> prefer to move people away from it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Multinet on the other hand scales well. And is possible to
> use directly both in VMS and RSX. However, it is silly and
> inefficient if all multinet links are to go to me. So I'm thinking
> about identifying a few people/places elsewhere in the world, which
> can be used for connections where it makes more sense for a somewhat
> closer point of connection.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, I would go on dealing with Europe. Might at some point
> be that we'd like a second point in the south of Europe, but that is
> not a high priority right now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> However, for the US, it would be nice if we could identify a
> location on each coast, which have a capable system, and normally is
> always online, and which have a good bandwidth, and would be willing
> to setup connections to new machines that want to come online.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, are there any takers? I'll continue to be the first
> point of contact when people come asking, but I'd be happy if I
> could redirect them to the appropriate person once we have figured
> out a few basic details.
> >>>>>> And then these two persons can work on establishing the
> actual link.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Johnny
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> >>>>>> || on a psychedelic trip
> >>>>>> email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>
> || Reading murder books
> >>>>>> pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" -
> B. Idol
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> > --
> > Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> > || on a psychedelic trip
> > email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se> ||
> Reading murder books
> > pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
>
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
More information about the Hecnet-list
mailing list