[HECnet] Off Topic - pfSense on Hyper-V

[Rob Jarratt]

The physical machine has three NICs.

 

A Realtek one which is on the LAN and used to access the host for management purposes.

 

A dual port Intel one (Intel PRO/1000 PT) which provides the LAN and WAN interfaces to the virtual machine.

 

Regards

 

Rob

 

From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE <owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE> On Behalf Of Supratim Sanyal
Sent: 10 August 2020 14:01
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Off Topic - pfSense on Hyper-V

 

Rob - The physical NICs - is one Broadcom and the other Intell?





---

Supratim Sanyal, W1XMT

39.19151 N, 77.23432 W

QCOCAL::SANYAL via HECnet <http://www.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet.html> 

 


On Aug 10, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Keith Halewood <Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org <mailto:Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org> > wrote:

Is it something to do with the virtual switch setting that permits/prevents multiple Mac addresses from the same virtual adapter?





On 10 Aug 2020, at 08:35, Rob Jarratt <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com <mailto:robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> > wrote:

 

I realise this is completely off topic, but I think this list has a lot of experienced networking people, so I am hoping someone might have a suggestion.

 

I have pfSense running as my firewall at home, running on Hyper-V. In case you don’t know, it runs on FreeBSD. I have run it for a few years and really want to get it upgraded to the latest. But when I do the upgrade doesn’t work because every packet in the WAN interface seems to get lost, it just cannot send anything to the WAN. The LAN side is fine.

 

I posted on the pfSense forums about this a long time ago. I got some questions about the MTU, but it was fine

 

I was just wondering if you have any thoughts/suggestions/experiences?

 

Thanks

 

Rob

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20200810/dffa6eba/attachment-0001.html>