[HECnet] Off Topic - pfSense on Hyper-V

[August Treubig]

Pfsense likes intel nics best.

Aug

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Supratim Sanyal <supratim at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> Ok - the Realtek is part of the motherboard’s I/O panel and you have some sort of a PCI-e dual-port card with an Intel chipset. I ran into a very similar issue with my Sophos UTM9 software appliance running on Ubuntu (a quad gigabit Intel chipset card) - The numbers of packet errors would keep climbing up very fast. I switched to a Broadcom and that worked. 
> 
> 
> ---
> Supratim Sanyal, W1XMT
> 39.19151 N, 77.23432 W
> QCOCAL::SANYAL via HECnet
> 
> 
>> On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:15 PM, Rob Jarratt <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The physical machine has three NICs.
>>  
>> A Realtek one which is on the LAN and used to access the host for management purposes.
>>  
>> A dual port Intel one (Intel PRO/1000 PT) which provides the LAN and WAN interfaces to the virtual machine.
>>  
>> Regards
>>  
>> Rob
>>  
>> From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE <owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE> On Behalf Of Supratim Sanyal
>> Sent: 10 August 2020 14:01
>> To: hecnet at update.uu.se
>> Subject: Re: [HECnet] Off Topic - pfSense on Hyper-V
>>  
>> Rob - The physical NICs - is one Broadcom and the other Intell?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> Supratim Sanyal, W1XMT
>> 39.19151 N, 77.23432 W
>> QCOCAL::SANYAL via HECnet
>>  
>> 
>> On Aug 10, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Keith Halewood <Keith.Halewood at pitbulluk.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Is it something to do with the virtual switch setting that permits/prevents multiple Mac addresses from the same virtual adapter?
>> 
>> 
>> On 10 Aug 2020, at 08:35, Rob Jarratt <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I realise this is completely off topic, but I think this list has a lot of experienced networking people, so I am hoping someone might have a suggestion.
>>  
>> I have pfSense running as my firewall at home, running on Hyper-V. In case you don’t know, it runs on FreeBSD. I have run it for a few years and really want to get it upgraded to the latest. But when I do the upgrade doesn’t work because every packet in the WAN interface seems to get lost, it just cannot send anything to the WAN. The LAN side is fine.
>>  
>> I posted on the pfSense forums about this a long time ago. I got some questions about the MTU, but it was fine
>>  
>> I was just wondering if you have any thoughts/suggestions/experiences?
>>  
>> Thanks
>>  
>> Rob
>>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20200810/49bbf6db/attachment.html>