[HECnet] Intermittent Connection with PyDECnet?
Thomas DeBellis
tommytimesharing at gmail.com
Mon Mar 2 15:55:18 PST 2020
I appear to have neither CIRCUIT VERIFICATION nor NODE TRANSMIT
PASSWORD, viz:
NCP>set cirCUIT ni-0 ? ALL
or one of the following:
ACTIVE BABBLE BLOCKING CHANNEL COST
COUNTER DEAD
DTE DYING HELLO INACTIVE LINE
LISTEN MAXIMUM
NUMBER OWNER POLLING RECALL ROUTER
SERVICE STATE
TRANSMIT TRIBUTARY TYPE USAGE
NCP>set noDE venti2:: ? ALL
or one of the following:
ADDRESS CIRCUIT
or one of the following:
AREA BROADCAST BUFFER CONSOLE COUNTER
CPU DELAY DIAGNOSTIC DUMP HARDWARE
HOST IDENTIFICATION INACTIVITY INCOMING LOAD
MAXIMUM OUTGOING RETRANSMIT ROUTING SECONDARY
SEGMENT SERVICE SOFTWARE STATE SUBADDRESSES
TERTIARY TYPE
I may be mis-remembering how our DN200 was configured. I believe the
Top-20 NCP parser may have shared keyword tables with other DECnet
implementations via BLISS at one point. Anyway, I recall at least some
of it was BLISS. I haven't look in that particular box lately, but the
parse tables appear to assembler now, with heavy uses of GLXMAC macros.
The Tops-20 operator interface has two 'sub-modes', as it were: NCP and
LCP. NCP parses DECnet related keywords. LCP is used for LAT
configuration. The operator subsystem is kind of neat; OPR parsers send
packets to Orion, a communications server and router. It notes an NCP
subset and routes that to NMLT20 which contains just what you think it
would.
Early versions of NMLT20 (about 1980) appeared insufficiently
productized. It could hang in a loop or (more frequently) crash for no
readily apparent reason. We submitted a rather large number of SPR's...
However, it's quite stable now; I don't believe I've had a single
crash. I have yet to come to a fully informed conclusion about the
lexical interface; I sometimes get the impression that it parses for
more than it can actually do.
Elsewhere in Tops-20, DECnet implementation is a mixed bag; most of the
monitor code appears finished; I go months without reboots and that is
with active development. The user mode code is another matter
entirely. I had my hands full fixing a number of issues with DAP and
FAL. It was /invaluable/ having heterogeneous HECnet nodes to test
against, RSX 11M+ and VMS. SETNOD needs some finishing and perhaps some
additional functionality. I have yet to look at FTS; I don't see how it
can get or generate any traffic at all. The monitor interface (NFT:)
does not appear to be operational. Elsewhere (perhaps Galaxy) appears to
have no submission interface. Johnny and I have some minor tweaks to
flush out with MAIL11 (in addition to the changes that I've already put in).
On 3/2/20 3:25 PM, Robert Armstrong wrote:
>
> >I don't see where I would set an id and password in 7-1-CONFIG or in NCP.
>
> Don’t know about TOPS-20, but in NCP/NICE/NML it’s
>
> SET CIRCUIT … VERIFICATION ENABLED
>
> and
>
> SET NODE … TRANSMIT PASSWORD …
>
> The password the remote node sends has to match the one that’s
> associated with that node in the local DECnet database.
>
> Bob
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20200302/30fafd5e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Hecnet-list
mailing list