[HECnet] No connectivity to arsgea 4

Fri Jan 22 10:01:15 PST 2021

I'll let you know. I thought it was the entire pi but it could well just be
the SD card, they don't seem to do much without an os.

It has pretty much sat doing its' thing in the same position for 10 years,
could well be more, with only the occasional power outage. In the early
days when I had real vintage hardware in the basement and a UPS I think I
got to nearly 2 years up time.

Regards, Mark.

On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 17:43, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:

> ...despite Peter's experience with a KA10. I can't really comment on the
> PDP-10s, since I've never worked much on them. But since I suspect they
> might not have had switched power supplies, I'm not surprised if it
> worked just fine, even after longer storage.
>
> The only 10s I have worked a bit more on is KL10. And replacing a power
> supply for the MF10 was quite a job, since it was a linear supply with a
> big trafo in it. *Very* heavy... :-)
>
>    Johnny
>
> On 2021-01-22 18:39, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > And speaking of power - the one thing that I have experienced a lot on
> > 11/70 machines are the H7440 regulators. They tend to blow up. And
> > especially if just kept in storage for longer periods, and then starting
> > to be used again...
> >
> > Don't leave these machines off. That's all I say. That's when you get
> > trouble.
> >
> >    Johnny
> >
> > On 2021-01-22 18:36, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> >> Not really trying to claim there is anything particular about DEC
> >> equipment here. While they were built properly, I don't think there
> >> necessarily is anything exceptional about them.
> >>
> >> But no, I do not believe any components have been replaced. One of the
> >> biggest issue is when equipment are left turned off for longer times.
> >> That usually seems to be the time when problems appear. These machines
> >> are (or were) running 24/7, and have always done so. There might have
> >> been one or another card replaced from time to time, since they were
> >> on service contracts for a long time. But just by looking into them,
> >> if something had been replaced, it was a long time ago. Based just on
> >> the general look of the cards.
> >>
> >> By the way, we're talking 11/23 machines here. So BA23 box. Not that
> >> much loaded in them, so no big strain on the power supply.
> >>
> >> My experience with 11/70 machines are the same. If they are kept
> >> running, they usually just continue to work. If you have them off for
> >> a couple of years, you'll have a lot of work before they are stable
> >> again.
> >>
> >> But disk drives get into trouble with age, even if continually
> >> running. And some are worse than others. The RD53 is sortof infamous
> >> here...
> >>
> >>    Johnny
> >>
> >> On 2021-01-22 18:15, Dave McGuire wrote:
> >>>
> >>>    Sigh, yes, we all know of exceptions.  But even then, I doubt it
> >>> can be proven that those PDP-11 systems in production since the early
> >>> 80s have never had components replaced.
> >>>
> >>>    Not everything is built to DEC standards.  That said, all my life
> >>> I've been replacing chips, diodes, transistors, capacitors, and
> >>> sometimes even resistors in DEC gear.  It does happen, and it's not
> >>> uncommon.
> >>>
> >>>    The regulator bricks in the H742/H7420 power supplies tend to blow
> >>> Zener diodes.  That's fresh in my mind because we just lost another
> >>> one at the museum recently.  Those are failing with such frequency
> >>> now that I've purchased stocks of the components that tend to fail.
> >>> (we have a lot of those at the museum)  And those ARE built to DEC
> >>> standards.
> >>>
> >>>    Speaking of not being built to DEC standards, I've got a Heathkit
> >>> H8 on the bench right now, I'm repairing it for a new exhibit at the
> >>> museum.  Four failed (non-moving!) ICs replaced so far, it's very
> >>> nearly done.
> >>>
> >>>              -Dave
> >>>
> >>> On 1/22/21 12:03 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> >>>> Well, I know of PDP-11 systems out in production who have been
> >>>> running since the early 80s. The only thing that fails is the damn
> >>>> RD53...
> >>>> Replaced those about 20 years ago now. The rest of the machine was
> >>>> running just fine. At that at a steel mill, so not exactly a
> >>>> friendly environment. Last I heard, things were still running, but
> >>>> it might have been replaced by now. But anyway, it's the moving
> >>>> parts that cause problems. The rest usually just keep running...
> >>>>
> >>>>    Johnny
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2021-01-22 17:53, Dave McGuire wrote:
> >>>>> On 1/22/21 11:41 AM, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
> >>>>>> 10 years used to be nearly unheard of for retail machines with
> >>>>>> moving parts.  When nothing is moving, then supposedly there is
> >>>>>> nothing to burn out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    I don't know who told you that, but he/she knows jack point
> >>>>> squat about electronics.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    Materials migration and diffusion across junctions causes
> >>>>> semiconductor components to fail, tin whiskers cause shorts, some
> >>>>> types of capacitors dry out and/or have their electrolyte
> >>>>> deteriorate or crystallize, resistors drift, heat/cool cycles cause
> >>>>> PCB flexure resulting in cracked solder joints, corrosion in air
> >>>>> creeps into connector pin interfaces and forces pins apart, the
> >>>>> list goes on and on and on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    To be fair, some of the above-listed failure modes do in fact
> >>>>> involve things moving, though imperceptibly so, my point stands.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>                -Dave
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
>                                    ||  on a psychedelic trip
> email: bqt at softjar.se             ||  Reading murder books
> pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
>

-- 
https://www.qrz.com/db/M0NOM/P
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20210122/dde0f9df/attachment-0001.htm>