[HECnet] Multiple nodes failing NICE in the same way

[Supratim Sanyal]

On 11/12/21 8:22 PM, Paul Koning wrote:

> You can see the answer here: 
> http://akdesign.dyndns.org:8080/map/data .  They show as type 
> "unknown" because Linux (at least with the NML version you're using) 
> does not send a valid reply to the "show executor characteristics" 
> request -- the node type is missing.

Got it. Neat. Something needs to be done about it. Thanks Paul.


> paul
>
>> On Nov 12, 2021, at 5:52 PM, Supratim Sanyal <supratim at riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>> Just out of curiosity - what are FEDACH and FOMFOR telling your scanner?
>>
>>> On Nov 12, 2021, at 2:46 PM, Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> My network scanner is getting very strange responses from three 
>>> different nodes all misbehaving the same way: CAIR, MAGPIE, and FARGO.
>>>
>>> What I see is:
>>>
>>> 1. The connection to object 19 (NICE, the network management 
>>> listener) is accepted, but the version number that is supposed to be 
>>> sent as part of the accept is missing.
>>>
>>> 2. When I send a NICE request to the node, I get back a message with 
>>> this content:
>>>
>>> <28>Nov 12 20:35:16 dnetd[1688]: Cannot chdir to /nonexistent : No 
>>> such file or directory\n\xff\x00\x00
>>>
>>> All three nodes do this.  Configuration error that just happens to 
>>> exist on all three?
>>>
>>>   paul
>>>
>
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20211112/f6660d81/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SANYALNET-LABS-QR-CODE.png
Type: image/png
Size: 328 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20211112/f6660d81/attachment-0001.png>