[HECnet] DEfining HECnet node names on TOPS-10

[Thomas DeBellis]

It doesn't have to do with Thomas since about a year.  I fixed the DEC 
SETNOD and the problem doesn't happen in my rewrite.

It has to do with the rest of the Tops-20 folks, should they ever decide 
to update their node tables.

On 11/15/21 7:13 PM, Robert Armstrong wrote:
>    The RETURN depends on how Thomas is structuring his command files, but if
> it makes him happy then leave it.  It's ignored by the NODNAM program.
>
>    I agree with Supratim that I'd prefer sorted by address, but it hardly
> matters (and the NODNAM program doesn't care at all).  The main reason I
> like it sorted by address is because I occasionally cut out a subset (e.g.
> all the area 2 nodes) for testing, and that's impossible when sorted by
> name.
>
>    Meta-X sort-lines-region (or sort-lines-buffer) goes a long way though,
> although since you don't put leading zeros or spaces on the area number
> sorting lexically produces some unexpected orderings.
>
> Bob
>
>