[Pollinator] Fwd: Wild pollinators worth up to $2.4 billion to farmers, study finds

Ladadams at aol.com Ladadams at aol.com
Mon Jun 20 19:50:37 PDT 2011


 
  
____________________________________
 From: ckremen at gmail.com
Reply-to: ckremen at berkeley.edu
To:  lda at coevolution.org
Sent: 6/20/2011 5:57:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight  Time
Subj: Fwd: Wild pollinators worth up to $2.4 billion to farmers, study  
finds




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: UC Berkeley Media Relations <_ucbnews at berkeley.edu_ 
(mailto:ucbnews at berkeley.edu) >
Date:  Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM
Subject: Wild pollinators worth up to $2.4  billion to farmers, study finds
To: _ucbnews at berkeley.edu_ (mailto:ucbnews at berkeley.edu) 



 
News from the  University of California,  Berkeley –  6/20/11 
File #  18542 
Media Contact: Ann Brody Guy,  College of Natural Resources, _(510) 
643-1041_ (tel:(510)%20643-1041) , _(510)  301-2646_ (tel:(510)%20301-2646)  
(cell), _annguy at berkeley.edu_ (mailto:annguy at berkeley.edu)  
Source: See contacts  below 
Wild  pollinators worth up to $2.4 billion to farmers, study  finds 
_CLICK HERE FOR ONLINE  STORY_ 
(http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/06/20/wild-pollinators-worth-billions-to-farmers/)  
FOR IMMEDIATE  RELEASE 
Berkeley –  California agriculture reaps $937 million to $2.4 billion per  
year in economic value from wild, free-living bee species that serve the  
critical function of pollinating crops, according to a new study by scientists 
 at the University of California,  Berkeley, published this week in the 
June issue of  the journal _Rangelands_ (http://www.srmjournals.org/) . 
About one-third of the value of  California agriculture comes from  
pollinator-dependent crops, representing a net value of $11.7 billion per  year, 
according to the study. Currently, many farmers rent European honeybees  to 
ensure crop pollination, and it has been widely assumed that wild  pollinators 
were not a significant source of crop pollination. However, the  new study 
found that wild pollinators residing in  California’s natural habitats, 
chiefly rangelands,  provide 35-39 percent, or more than one-third, of all 
pollination “services”  to the state’s crops.  
“This means that preserving  rangelands has significant economic value, not 
only to the ranchers who graze  their cattle there, but also to farmers who 
need the pollinators,” said Claire  Kremen, UC Berkeley associate professor 
of environmental science, policy and  management, and senior author of the 
study.  
The study is the first to  calculate the percentage of crop pollinators 
that are wild, free-living  species based on their proximity to natural 
habitats, and thus to identify the  economic value of the pollination service due 
to wild pollinators.   
Researchers said both rented  European honeybees and wild pollinator bee 
species are currently experiencing  supply problems. More than 1 million 
honeybee colonies are imported to  California each year, chiefly for almond  
pollination. Recently, beekeepers have suffered high rates of colony losses  due 
to diseases, pesticides and management factors, increasing the uncertainty  
of both supply and rental prices.  
Wild pollinator species also show  declines in abundance and diversity on 
farmlands, most likely due to habitat  loss from the intensive monoculture, 
or single crop, production system that  typifies much of California’s 
agricultural  lands. 
“Currently, wild pollinators are  least abundant in intensive monoculture 
production areas such as sunflowers,  almonds and melons, where demand for 
pollination services is largest,” said  Kremen, who was named a 2007 MacArthur 
Fellow for her work in ecology,  biodiversity and agriculture. 
Wild  pollinators key to sustainability 
Kremen said the findings suggest  that if farmers paid ranchers to stay on 
the land and maintain the habitat,  the farmers would be increasing their 
sources of pollination and developing  critical diversification to support 
their agricultural  practices. 
“We would never invest all of our  retirement savings in just one stock, 
but this is essentially what farmers do  when they rely solely on the European 
honeybee for pollination,” said Kremen.  She said this is exactly what is 
occurring in  California agriculture right now.   
“Diversifying their monetary  investment in pollinators to include wild, 
rangeland-dwelling species is the  same idea as diversifying a stock portfolio,
” she said, adding that the  unpredictability associated with climate 
change amplifies the importance of  diversification.  
“Some insect species will thrive  in changed climate conditions, and other 
won’t. Maintaining a biodiverse stock  of pollinators is like the insurance 
that a diversified stock portfolio  brings: some will be up, some will be 
down, but having a portfolio of many  different species ensures viability into 
the future,” Kremen  said. 
Placing a value on ecosystem  services is an established part of 
conservation science and helps scientists  understand the contributions of various 
elements of an ecosystem and how they  influence each other. 
The UC Berkeley researchers  estimated the current contribution of wild 
pollinators to  California agriculture by integrating their  knowledge of the 
relationship between natural habitat and wild pollination  services with the 
added dimension of location-specific data.   
“Essentially, we identified where  wild pollinators were living in relation 
to crops. When we put it all on a  map, we got a highly informative picture 
of how the pollinators could be  impacting crop production,” Kremen said. 
She said they used data from the  National Agriculture Statistics Service on 
crop production and value to help  calculate the monetary value. 
Changing  perspective on role of rangeland  
Lynn Huntsinger, a professor of rangeland  management at UC Berkeley who is 
not affiliated with the study,  said that the findings are significant 
because the study is the  first to discover that conserving rangelands enhances 
crop  production. 
“This evidence of economic  symbiosis makes it clear that rangeland 
conservation cannot be separated from  the needs of agriculture, whether it is 
farming or ranching,” Huntsinger  said. 
She said that precisely because  rangelands have been used for ranching – 
livestock grazing – ranchers have  kept the land conserved and stewarded it 
in ways that result in habitat that  sustains wild bee species as well as 
other wildlife.   
“Studies in some ecosystems have  shown that well-managed grazing can keep 
invasive grasses from shading out the  flowering herbs that native 
pollinators rely on,” Huntsinger said.   
The state’s rangelands have been  decreasing steadily, as the foothills and 
oak-dotted grasslands can be highly  desirable for residential development, 
Huntsinger said.  California lost 105,000 acres of grazing lands to  
urbanization between 1990 and 2004, according to the state Department of  
Conservation. The California Oak Foundation projects that the state could lose  
another 750,000 acres by 2040.  
She said the vast majority of  rangelands are privately owned, and income 
from ranching is usually small  compared to the price the land can command in 
the real estate market, so when  cash is needed for college, retirement or 
other major expenses, ranchers face  strong pressure to sell. 
“This new finding about  pollinators is important because not only does it 
tell us something we need to  know to maintain our ability to grow food, it 
also provides a statewide value  for the service of providing pollinator 
habitat. Ranchers need to get that  value and other rangeland values recognized 
in order to sustain their  ranches,” Huntsinger said. 
The finding comes at a time when  there is growing interest within the 
ranching community in providing ecosystem  services, Huntsinger said. For 
example, as part of conservation efforts,  California ranchers have been asked to 
maintain  flowers for endangered butterflies and to keep small spring 
wetlands known as  vernal pools healthy – using grazing as a tool to manipulate 
the  grassland. 
Darrel Sweet, a fifth generation  cattle rancher from Livermore and a 
former  president of the California Cattlemen's Association, said that placing a  
dollar value on rangelands pollination services lends powerful support to  
these efforts.  
“The value of grazing and other  land stewardship practices of California’
s  ranchers is being increasingly acknowledged as not only a preferred land 
use,  but also as an essential resource management tool,” said Sweet. “I 
hope this  study is just the beginning of comparable findings that show how 
ranching is a  critical – and multifaceted – element of  California  
agriculture.” 
Calling to mind the classic  “Oklahoma!” song “The Farmer and Cowman 
Should Be Friends,” the study’s  findings suggest a host of ways farmers might 
work with ranchers to their  mutual benefit, Kremen said.  
While the study issues the caveat  that the exact value of pollination 
services from natural habitats is  difficult to pin down using currently 
available data, Kremen said the findings  highlight from a biophysical perspective 
how important this value  is. 
### 
Sources:  Claire Kremen, _(510) 643-6339_ (tel:(510)%20643-6339) , 
_ckremen at berkeley.edu_ (mailto:ckremen at berkeley.edu) 
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, _(831) 331-6015_ (tel:(831)%20331-6015) , 
_rchaplin at berkeley.edu_ (mailto:rchaplin at berkeley.edu) 
Lynn Huntsinger, _(510) 685-1884_ (tel:(510)%20685-1884) , 
_huntsinger at berkeley_ (mailto:huntsinger at berkeley.edu)  






-- 
Claire Kremen
Associate Professor and Head Graduate  Advisor
Environmental Sciences Policy and Management
130 Mulford  Hall
University of California 
Berkeley, CA  94720-3114

510-643-6339
Fax 510-643-5438
_http://nature.berkeley.edu/kremenlab/_ 
(http://nature.berkeley.edu/kremenlab/) 

_http://www.stockholmresilience.org/seminarandevents/seminarandeventvideos/p
ollinationservicesandagroecosystems.5.7f0b194e12b15a0bce78000508.html_ 
(http://www.stockholmresilience.org/seminarandevents/seminarandeventvideos/pollin
ationservicesandagroecosystems.5.7f0b194e12b15a0bce78000508.html) 

_http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/12/MNU710263B.DTL_
 
(http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/12/MNU710263B.DTL) 

_http://www.kqed.org/quest/television/view/434_ 
(http://www.kqed.org/quest/television/view/434) 

_http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2008/04/10_madagascar.shtml_ 
(http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2008/04/10_madagascar.shtml) 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/pollinator/attachments/20110620/5156ac44/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pollinator mailing list