[HECnet] Mapping - getting close

[sampsa at mac.com]

Bit more accurate, if messier: 

http://rhesus.sampsa.com/hnmap3.svg


sampsa






On 12 Jan 2013, at 10:45, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:

That seems to be more in agreement with what A44RTR sees of Hecnet:
5 areas (9,42,52,59,61) are reachable thru dimma, 4 (18,19,20,33) via SG1 and 3 (3,7,8)   via Gorvax. 
-----Original Message-----
From: Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:07:54 
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Mapping - getting close


On 11 Jan 2013, at 22:06, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:

On Jan 11, 2013, at 22:03, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:


On 11 Jan 2013, at 22:01, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:

On Jan 11, 2013, at 21:15, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:


On 11 Jan 2013, at 21:14, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:

On 2013-01-12 00:37, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Another with some overlap but less horizontal space:

http://rhesus.sampsa.com/hnmap2.svg

Looks rather weird. I assume PONDUS.637 is actually an attempt at the ethernet bridge, but it don't match reality much.
Also, totally missing some areas, like area 59   

And area 9   but Ciscos aren't handled yet. :p

I'm working on that. :)

What's the current plan for solving it?

I'm concurrently attacking it from three different directions: ssh, snmp and mop remote console.

My virtual cisco only supports SSH1. ;)

I probably misconfigured SNMP.

MOP remote console might work!   How would I test again?


First one done wins. :)

I'd like to get all three working though for ultimate flexibility.

-brian

--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.