[HECnet] Hecnet Peering

[Hans Vlems]

Ah Johnny that's an easy choice then :-)
I'll stick to the bridge then

Happy New Year!

Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
   Origineel bericht   
Van: Johnny Billquist
Verzonden: vrijdag 2 januari 2015 18:34
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Hecnet Peering

On 2015-01-02 18:28, Hans Vlems wrote:
Is there an advantage if you use a tunnel in stead of Johnny's bridge
program    which I use?

It scales better and use less network bandwidth, if that is a concern.
But it won't pass through LAT or MOP. Pick your poison. :-)

Johnny

Hans

Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
*Van: *Tim Sneddon
*Verzonden: *vrijdag 2 januari 2015 18:24
*Aan: *hecnet at update.uu.se
*Beantwoorden: *hecnet at Update.UU.SE
*Onderwerp: *Re: [HECnet] Hecnet Peering


On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net
<mailto:steve at davidson.net>> wrote:

Tim,

The short form... DEChubs are us. I have both the backplanes and
the MultiStacks. They currently have hubs, LAT servers, and
dedicated LAT printer modules. I even have the Packet Probe module
with software...


That should work nicely.

Regards, Tim.



-- 
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol