[HECnet] Hecnet Peering

[Johnny Billquist]

On 2015-01-02 18:28, Hans Vlems wrote:
Is there an advantage if you use a tunnel in stead of Johnny's bridge
program    which I use?

It scales better and use less network bandwidth, if that is a concern.
But it won't pass through LAT or MOP. Pick your poison. :-)

	Johnny

Hans

Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
*Van: *Tim Sneddon
*Verzonden: *vrijdag 2 januari 2015 18:24
*Aan: *hecnet at update.uu.se
*Beantwoorden: *hecnet at Update.UU.SE
*Onderwerp: *Re: [HECnet] Hecnet Peering


On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Steve Davidson <steve at davidson.net
<mailto:steve at davidson.net>> wrote:

      Tim,

      The short form...   DEChubs are us.   I have both the backplanes and
      the MultiStacks.   They currently have hubs, LAT servers, and
      dedicated LAT printer modules.   I even have the Packet Probe module
      with software...


That should work nicely.

Regards, Tim.



-- 
Johnny Billquist                                   || "I'm on a bus
                                                                  ||   on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se                         ||   Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                                         ||   tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol