[HECnet] Cisco tunnels: update my IP

[Cory Smelosky]

I need to keep the router and switch maintained so I don't get calls at 4am because my dad needs to check sports scores. ;)

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave McGuire" <mcguire at neurotica.com>
> To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 8:33:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [HECnet] Cisco tunnels: update my IP

> "Downloading the entire Internet"...I love it. :)
> 
>  I didn't know you were still running hardware at your old place in Ohio..?
> 
>           -Dave
> 
> On 06/23/2016 12:09 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
>> With ZFS replication across work/home and home/old Ohio stuff, downloading the
>> entire internet, and being impatient...I do quite regularly max it out. ;)
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dave McGuire" <mcguire at neurotica.com>
>>> To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 8:14:53 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [HECnet] Cisco tunnels: update my IP
>> 
>>> Nice and all...but how much are you actually *using*? ;)
>>>
>>>             -Dave
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
>>> New Kensington, PA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On June 23, 2016 11:13:04 AM Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 175/10 cable with a constant ache to upgrade to gigabit from one of the
>>>> providers. ;)
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Brian Hechinger" <wonko at 4amlunch.net>
>>>>> To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 8:09:24 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [HECnet] Cisco tunnels: update my IP
>>>>
>>>>> What sort of connection do you have?
>>>>>
>>>>> -brian
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 10:55, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...it also exceeds the capabilities of a 2851.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 07:26, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My connection exceeds the capabilities of the 2620 or I would.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 05:30, Peter Lothberg <roll at Stupi.SE> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why don't you put your 2600 as your boarder-gw?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> interface Tunnel1
>>>>>>>> ip address 192.108.195.70 255.255.255.252
>>>>>>>> ip router isis
>>>>>>>> ipv6 address 2001:440:1880:ABCD::2/64
>>>>>>>> ipv6 enable
>>>>>>>> ipv6 mtu 1420
>>>>>>>> ipv6 router isis
>>>>>>>> decnet cost 1
>>>>>>>> isis metric 2
>>>>>>>> tunnel source ATM0/1/0.1
>>>>>>>> tunnel destination 192.36.147.120
>>>>>>>> !
>>>>>>>> interface ATM0/1/0
>>>>>>>> mtu 4470
>>>>>>>> no ip address
>>>>>>>> ip virtual-reassembly in max-fragments 64 max-reassemblies 512
>>>>>>>> load-interval 30
>>>>>>>> atm restart timer 90
>>>>>>>> no atm ilmi-keepalive
>>>>>>>> dsl enable-training-log delay 0
>>>>>>>> dsl power-cutback 6
>>>>>>>> dsl noise-margin -2
>>>>>>>> dsl gain-setting rx-offset 3
>>>>>>>> dsl bitswap both
>>>>>>>> !
>>>>>>>> interface ATM0/1/0.1 point-to-point
>>>>>>>> mtu 4470
>>>>>>>> ip dhcp client broadcast-flag set
>>>>>>>> ip address dhcp
>>>>>>>> ip nat outside
>>>>>>>> ip virtual-reassembly in
>>>>>>>> atm route-bridged ip
>>>>>>>> pvc 0/35
>>>>>>>> protocol bridge
>>>>>>>> encapsulation aal5snap
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/06/2016 1:47 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Found the actual problem!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IPSec VTI VPNs means I can't do source-based NAT/firewall rules to redirect GRE
>>>>>>>>>> from the DECnet tunnel IPs to a separate box as is currently configured.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, does this mean that you're still off the air?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards, Tim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> `
> 
> --
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA