[HECnet] Intermittent Connection with PyDECnet?
Johnny Billquist
bqt at softjar.se
Mon Mar 2 17:07:13 PST 2020
Did you see any SET EXEC TRANSMIT PASSWORD maybe?
Anyway, the NCP parsing in RSX is all written in MACRO-11, so it was
never shared with anything written in BLISS.
Johnny
On 2020-03-03 00:55, Thomas DeBellis wrote:
> I appear to have neither CIRCUIT VERIFICATION nor NODE TRANSMIT
> PASSWORD, viz:
>
> NCP>set cirCUIT ni-0 ? ALL
> or one of the following:
> ACTIVE BABBLE BLOCKING CHANNEL COST
> COUNTER DEAD
> DTE DYING HELLO INACTIVE LINE
> LISTEN MAXIMUM
> NUMBER OWNER POLLING RECALL ROUTER
> SERVICE STATE
> TRANSMIT TRIBUTARY TYPE USAGE
>
> NCP>set noDE venti2:: ? ALL
> or one of the following:
> ADDRESS CIRCUIT
> or one of the following:
> AREA BROADCAST BUFFER CONSOLE COUNTER
> CPU DELAY DIAGNOSTIC DUMP HARDWARE
> HOST IDENTIFICATION INACTIVITY INCOMING LOAD
> MAXIMUM OUTGOING RETRANSMIT ROUTING SECONDARY
> SEGMENT SERVICE SOFTWARE STATE SUBADDRESSES
> TERTIARY TYPE
>
> I may be mis-remembering how our DN200 was configured. I believe the
> Top-20 NCP parser may have shared keyword tables with other DECnet
> implementations via BLISS at one point. Anyway, I recall at least some
> of it was BLISS. I haven't look in that particular box lately, but the
> parse tables appear to assembler now, with heavy uses of GLXMAC macros.
>
> The Tops-20 operator interface has two 'sub-modes', as it were: NCP and
> LCP. NCP parses DECnet related keywords. LCP is used for LAT
> configuration. The operator subsystem is kind of neat; OPR parsers send
> packets to Orion, a communications server and router. It notes an NCP
> subset and routes that to NMLT20 which contains just what you think it
> would.
>
> Early versions of NMLT20 (about 1980) appeared insufficiently
> productized. It could hang in a loop or (more frequently) crash for no
> readily apparent reason. We submitted a rather large number of SPR's...
> However, it's quite stable now; I don't believe I've had a single
> crash. I have yet to come to a fully informed conclusion about the
> lexical interface; I sometimes get the impression that it parses for
> more than it can actually do.
>
> Elsewhere in Tops-20, DECnet implementation is a mixed bag; most of the
> monitor code appears finished; I go months without reboots and that is
> with active development. The user mode code is another matter
> entirely. I had my hands full fixing a number of issues with DAP and
> FAL. It was /invaluable/ having heterogeneous HECnet nodes to test
> against, RSX 11M+ and VMS. SETNOD needs some finishing and perhaps some
> additional functionality. I have yet to look at FTS; I don't see how it
> can get or generate any traffic at all. The monitor interface (NFT:)
> does not appear to be operational. Elsewhere (perhaps Galaxy) appears to
> have no submission interface. Johnny and I have some minor tweaks to
> flush out with MAIL11 (in addition to the changes that I've already put in).
>
>
> On 3/2/20 3:25 PM, Robert Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> >I don't see where I would set an id and password in 7-1-CONFIG or in NCP.
>>
>> Don’t know about TOPS-20, but in NCP/NICE/NML it’s
>>
>> SET CIRCUIT … VERIFICATION ENABLED
>>
>> and
>>
>> SET NODE … TRANSMIT PASSWORD …
>>
>> The password the remote node sends has to match the one that’s
>> associated with that node in the local DECnet database.
>>
>> Bob
>>
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
More information about the Hecnet-list
mailing list