[Pollinator] CCD in the NYT
David Inouye
inouye at umd.edu
Tue Jul 17 11:42:44 PDT 2007
The New York Times
July 17, 2007
Bees Dying: Is It a Crisis or a Phase?
By
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/andrew_c_revkin/index.html?inline=nyt-per>ANDREW
C. REVKIN
Over the last year, large die-offs of commercial
honeybee colonies, from unknown causes, have
raised concern that an agricultural crisis is at
hand. Now, however, some experts on insect
biology and bee rearing are questioning how
unusual the die-offs are, saying commercial
beekeeping has long had a pattern of die-offs,
and without better monitoring, there is not
enough information to know if anything new or calamitous is happening.
If the problem is worse than before, they say, it
may be because more bee colonies are being housed
and trucked by fewer beekeepers, raising the
chances of infestations or infections spreading.
The official word, endorsed by many scientists
and people in beekeeping businesses, is that a
newly named syndrome, called
<http://maarec.cas.psu.edu/ColonyCollapseDisorder.html>colony
collapse disorder,or CCD, is at work and poses a
significant threat to American fruit, nut and vegetable crops.
An
<http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2007/070713.htm>action
plan released Friday by the Department of
Agriculture used the phrase CCD crisis to
describe the recent die-offs, even as it said it
was uncertain whether CCD is a new phenomenon
and described similar die-offs as long ago as 1898.
No one in the field doubts that commercial
beekeepers in more than 20 states have seen large
declines in hive populations in the last year
more than 70 percent in some cases and that
agriculture is facing problems pollinating some crops.
It is also clear that bees in the Americas, both
wild native species and honeybees, which were
imported long ago and are the commercial
standard, have been hard hit in recent decades by mites and infectious agents.
What some scientists say is missing from the
debate is historical context. Every time there
are these disappearances, the ills of the moment
tend to be held accountable, said May Berenbaum,
who heads the entomology department at the
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and led a
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/n/national_academy_of_sciences/index.html?inline=nyt-org>National
Academy of Sciences
<http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11761.html>review of
the status of North American bees and other
pollinators that was published last year.
In the 60s it was synthetic organic
insecticides, Dr. Berenbaum said. In the 70s
it was Africanized bee genes. In the 19th
century, there is a wonderful report about this
resulting from a lack of moral fiber. Weak
character was why they werent returning to the hives.
One thing almost everyone seems to agree on is
the need for consistent, frequent censuses of the
countrys bee populations, but money for
monitoring has not been increased, bee experts said.
Eric Mussen, a bee expert at the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_california/index.html?inline=nyt-org>University
of California, Davis, said he did not understand
the talk of catastrophe, noting that even after
colonies are lost, beekeepers can quickly replace them.
Michael Burgett, a professor emeritus of
entomology at
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/o/oregon_state_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org>Oregon
State University, said the big honeybee losses in
some regions could simply reflect unremarkable
spikes above a common level of mortality of more
than 20 percent in recent decades.
In the late 1970s we had another scare similar
to this, Dr. Burgett said. They called it
disappearing disease at the time. But we never
found a specific cause for it, we continued to
improve our bee management programs and disappearing disease disappeared.
<http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html>Copyright
2007 <http://www.nytco.com/>The New York Times Company
More information about the Pollinator
mailing list