[Pollinator] Salon.com on CCD and pollinators
Ladadams at aol.com
Ladadams at aol.com
Tue May 29 09:59:27 PDT 2007
Salon.com
A round table of experts answer all our pressing questions about the sudden
death of the nation's bees. What they have to say has a bigger sting than we
ever expected.
By Kevin Berger
May 29, 2007 | The buzz about the alarming disappearance of bees has been all
about people food. Honeybees pollinate one-third of the fruits, nuts and
vegetables that end up in our homey kitchen baskets. If the tireless apian workers
didn't fly from one flower to the next, depositing pollen grains so that
fruit trees can bloom, America could well be asking where its next meal would come
from. Last fall, the nation's beekeepers watched in horror as more than a
quarter of their 2.4 million colonies collapsed, killing billions of nature's
little fertilizers.
But as a Salon round table discussion with bee experts revealed, the mass
exodus of bees to the great hive in the sky forebodes a bigger story. The
faltering dance between honeybees and trees is symptomatic of industrial disease. As
the scientists outlined some of the biological agents behind "colony collapse
disorder," and dismissed the ones that are not -- sorry, friends, the Rapture
is out -- they sketched a picture of how we are forever altering the planet's
delicate web of life.
The scientists constituted a fascinating foursome, each with his own point of
view. _Jeffrey Pettis,_
(http://www.ars.usda.gov/pandp/people/people.htm?personid=10138) research leader of the USDA's honeybee lab, told us the current
collapse is one of the worst in history. _Eric Mussen,_
(http://entomology.ucdavis.edu/faculty/facpage.cfm?id=mussen) of the Honey Bee Research Facility at
the University of California at Davis, maintained that it may only be
cyclical. _Wayne Esaias,_ (http://aqua.nasa.gov/about/instrument_modis_team.php) of
the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, an amateur beekeeper, outlined his
compelling views about the impact of climate change on bees. And John McDonald, a
biologist, beekeeper and gentleman farmer in rural Pennsylvania, reminded us, if
at times sardonically, of the poetry in agriculture.
First things first. The Internet, as you know, loves a rumor. Are
_cellphones_ (http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/56901.html) killing the bees?
JEFFREY PETTIS: All the explanations that bees became disoriented by
cellphone radiation, or this, that and the other thing -- there is zero evidence for
any of it. All we know is we lost the worker population and they died away from
the hive. What's unusual is they died over a short time period. Are they
flying off to Nirvana? Who knows where they are? They are just dying away from the
hive, which is normal.
ERIC MUSSEN: It's important to look at what's normal. In the summer, bees go
through a six-week life cycle: three inside the hive, three outside it as
foragers. Then they die of old age. When bees are coming to the end of their life
for whatever reason, they just fly off and don't come back. They fly out to
die because flying out and dying is what they do. The question is, Why are we
seeing bees with such a shortened life cycle? Well, now we're talking about w
inter bees. As you move into fall, the colony is supposed to be rearing bees that
have a long life expectancy -- from about October to March of the next year.
The problem is the winter bees aren't making it. Everything just sort of fell
apart near the end of this summer and those bees that were supposed to live up
to six months didn't come close.
JOHN McDONALD: That cellphone thing is a major source of irritation to me. If
it were true, I suspect about 10,000 people at Penn State would be lying on
the street dead now. And yet you see them walking around and talking on
cellphones. My son explained to me that cellphone radiation puts out a wavelength of
about three inches. A honeybee is three-quarters of an inch long and so the
bee is going to create virtually no shadow in that wavelength. That's one reason
why I look askance at that theory. The other is where I live, in the middle
of Appalachia, the bees are disappearing and there are virtually no cellphones.
One scientist has said solving the bees' disappearance is like "CSI" for
agriculture. What's the latest word from the lab?
PETTIS: The latest word is we're working on a lot of different samples we've
collected throughout the year. We're working under the idea that bees have
suffered a one-two punch. The first is a primary stressor -- poor diet, mites, or
low-level pesticide exposure. That puts them in a compromised or weak state,
and then a secondary pathogen takes over. Because of how quickly the bees are
dying, it seems most likely a pathogen would be involved. So we're looking for
a secondary pathogen that might be unique or novel.
Are pesticides a major culprit?
MUSSEN: Perhaps 10 percent of commercial bee colonies in any given year are
either severely damaged or die on contact with agricultural pesticides. But
there's no reason to believe the exposure this year is any different from last
year or any other year.
John, you wrote a pretty strong _opinion piece_
(http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/10/HOG5FOH9VQ1.DTL) that fingered _Bt crops,_
(http://www.bt.ucsd.edu/) which have been genetically modified to control
insect pests. Based on your experiences as a beekeeper, how did you come to that
conclusion?
McDONALD: My first collapse started last summer when a powerful colony, in a
manner of a week, went downhill. The drone cone sort of cascaded down over the
foundation like ice on a mountain. In another hive that was equally strong,
the bees ended up lying dead on a mat that extended about six feet. That didn't
happen with the other hives, which is indicative of agricultural poisoning.
Also, the drones hung around until snowfall, which is unusual, indicating some
kind of kind of behavioral dysfunction with the worker bees.
I did a little research and found two studies about the Bt phenomenon. When
you look at the action of Bt gene proteins taken up in the gut of insects,
including bees, you find an enzyme that gobbles its way through any protein there
and affects the insects. And bees are known to forage on corn flowers to get
pollen to rear their young brood. I'm not saying Bt is the sole cause of
collapse, only that I would like to have it investigated.
Is there any evidence, Jeff or Eric, of Bt crops killing bees?
MUSSEN: When Bt crops were being used in the fields to control lepidopteron
insects, or butterflies, there were a significant number of studies run to try
to determine whether or not incorporating Bt into the food of the adult bees,
or the larvae, would hurt the bees. And the answer was no.
PETTIS: I contributed to a recent study where we directly fed the Bt toxin to
whole bee colonies and could demonstrate no effects on them.
MUSSEN: There was a study, and perhaps this is the one John is referring to,
that showed the active chemical in these Bt cultures is a protein crystal that
develops in organisms. For four years in a row, an institution fed that
protein to honeybees at 10 times the amount that they would ever encounter in the
field if they were feeding on pollen. In three of the four years, they saw
nothing out of the ordinary. In the fourth year, a parasite showed up, and the
bees that had been consuming the protein appeared to suffer more. The experiment
didn't say the Bt protein gave the bees the "disappearing" disease, or that it
killed all of them; it just said the bees that came in contact with the crops
appeared to be more negatively affected by the parasite.
Can you tell us about your experiences with colony collapse, Wayne, and your
studies to understand wider ecological causes?
WAYNE ESAIAS: Sure. I'm a small beekeeper. I have about 15 colonies and have
experienced some loss. I realize there are many symptoms involved. Still,
there are one or two I'm puzzled about. I keep records of when my bees collect
pollen and nectar in my backyard. I weigh the hive and I have a time series that
goes back to 1992. What I've seen over the course of that time is due to local
warming: The pollen and nectar flow come almost a month earlier than they did
in the 1970s. This is coincident with the urbanization of the D.C.-Baltimore
area, causing temperatures to rise.
I'm also using data from NASA satellites to address how global warming or
environmental change might be impacting our honeybee populations, and even the
spread of the African honeybee. We see plants blooming at different times of the
year, and that's why the nectar flows are so much earlier now. I need to
underscore that I have no evidence that global warming is a key player in colony
collapse disorder. But it might be a contributor, and changes like this might
be upping the stress level of our bee populations.
One new study suggested the collapse might be the result of a rare spore
called Nosema ceranae.
MUSSEN: If you get enough Nosema ceranae, yes, a colony will die. If you get
enough viruses, the colony will die. If you get enough mites, the colony will
die. If you get exposure to insecticides, the colony will die. So all these
things that we are looking at are capable of doing in a colony. There's no doubt
about it. So could a true lack of food. Literally, you could starve the bees
to death. Beekeepers have accidentally done that many times. What you're going
to find is that in most cases there is not going to be one factor that did
them in; it's going to be a combination. This is the perfect storm for
honeybees.
Millions of bees in California alone are trucked around from town to town to
be used as pollinators on farms. That's got to be awfully stressful on them,
right?
MUSSEN: Yes, it's a stress. But commercial beekeepers have been moving
substantial numbers of colonies on trucks for decades. I'm not convinced that
they're being moved more, or that it beats them up any worse that it did ten years
ago. California beekeepers have told me that in a course of moving the colonies
around in the back of the truck, they tend to lose 10 percent of the queens
with each move. Some feel it's that high. But that doesn't meant that 10
percent of your bee colonies died; many of them will come back and you will still
have a colony.
One researcher has said that the competition for food among the millions of
bees used to pollinate almond trees in California could, essentially, be
working them to death. Do you agree?
MUSSEN: Almond trees aren't the problem. It's what happens after the bees are
done with the trees and are brought back to the holding yards. In late fall,
there is basically no food -- after the almonds -- so the bees have to fend
for themselves. Besides eucalyptus trees, there's a bunch of weeds that the bees
can feed on. They don't get heavy and fat but they've got some food
available.
PETTIS: Beekeepers are always looking for what they call "good pasture,"
places they can put the bees and not have to feed the bees themselves. Florida has
an abundant and diverse set of floral plants, so the bees are not suffering.
What's interesting is that there's a number of government control programs for
invasive weeds. Beekeepers love invasive weeds. Most produce a lot of nectar
for the bees. So there's been competition in some cities over getting rid of
the noxious weeds and keeping them for beekeepers. But California is unusual in
that beekeepers are doing what we are starting to call "feedlot beekeeping,"
where we are having to provide resources because there is just not enough food
out there. And this is just to meet the almond-pollination demands.
MUSSEN: The real problem in California is that we've only had half a normal
rainfall this year. So after the almonds, when the bees went out to find other
things, there was barely anything there. What was really interesting was some
of the bees looked like they were well on their way to establishing good
colonies. They looked like they could live on the stored almonds they had picked up
in the late summer and fall. But this time they collapsed. So that's the
question: Why?
And what's your answer?
MUSSEN: I'm probably the strongest advocate in the United States suggesting
that malnutrition was the underlying thing that set up our bees to be whacked
by everything else researchers are looking at. Honeybees rely on pollen for
protein, vitamins, fats and minerals. That's where their major "health food"
comes from. If we are having a typical year, and the rains come, there aren't too
many places in the United States where the bees cannot find their mix of
pollens to meet their dietary needs and get them through a normal life cycle.
The question is, What happens when things don't go like that? Well, you get
this blast of hot temperature, which is about the time the flower buds are
forming and the pollen grains are beginning to form. What does that do? You get
sterile pollen. A beekeeper could look into the hive and say, "I've got all
kinds of pollen in there and the bees disappeared." Well, right, you've got pollen
grains, but do they have any nutrition in them?
Anything that interferes with the availability of food, or the quality of the
food, is going to be detrimental to the bees. They don't have much of an
immune system, so the only way that they can resist being infected by a lot of
things is when they have their innate resistance up, and the best resistance is
when they're best fed. So my feeling is that their nutrition just wasn't what
it was supposed to be, and they were susceptible when they should have been
resistant. I think something happened at the end of last year in many places in
the temperate climate around the world, not just here, and fouled up the bees'
food supply. Unless somebody tells me differently, I'm blaming it on the
weather.
ESAIAS: One of the things that I've noticed in my short little time series in
my backyard is that I could pick out every El Niño and La Niña effect. These
are normal. These short-term climate changes are normal, and our bee
population and our natural pollinator population have seen them, and they can probably
handle them. What is disturbing is the long-term trend. Maybe years of severe
climate impact are going to be more frequent and it's going to be really
difficult to pick them out as causative factors unless we have a coherent way of
studying each one.
Could the bees be dying because once they are sent out to do their work as
pollinators on farms, they can't find their way back to their colonies?
Sometimes it seems like there are more mini-malls in America than flowers, and maybe
the bees can't navigate urban land patterns.
MUSSEN: Land patterns would be the least of their problems. When a honeybee
transitions from an in-hive bee to an outside bee, it flies back and forth
around the hive for a few minutes. Then it backs off and goes further away. In the
process, it is taking a bunch of snapshots. That's how it's going to navigate
from that time on -- through those snapshots. It's going to learn the roads,
the trees, the houses, and the part of the hive with the entrance it uses.
Bees use those landmarks to determine where they are and where they are going.
That's another reason why cellphone communication is not going to rattle them
unless it completely fries their brains so they can't see anymore. But when you
put them into the environment where they have been flying, they'll follow
their landmarks home. So I don't think we have to worry about that.
McDONALD: I'm not sure. I've been thinking about the size of the current
soybean and corn crop, which I think impacts on this. When we fly over the fields
in a jet, we look down and think we see some pastoral idyll. But the truth of
the matter is, we may be looking at a slow-motion ecological train wreck. I
made some calculations, and the total soybean and corn crop, including
genetically modified seeds, is in a neighborhood of 102 million acres. After a little
basic arithmetic, that would be a strip of crops running from Pennsylvania to
the Rocky Mountains. It would be 100 miles wide, and if you were flying over in
a plane, it would take you four hours. When you look at that thing at that
magnitude of disruption, you can't help but suspect that maybe there's more to
the picture than meets the eye, when you consider the absolute scale of things,
compared with natural environments where you still have weeds and flowers.
ESAIAS: Land use has changed drastically in the past 100 years. There's no
question that urbanization is increasing at a fantastic rate. I was thinking, as
I was listening to John, that a lot of these concerns apply to our native
pollinators -- the things that live in the hedge rows and the woods -- much more
so than to our managed bee colonies, which are generally cared for by
beekeepers. Crops are a significant source of pollen and nectar for our bees and our
pollinators, and there is no doubt in my mind that the flora quality is
changing, even if we can't say whether it's for the better or worse just now.
McDONALD: You know, I was looking at my flowering trees the other day. I have
a beautiful weeping crabapple, and my grandson, while standing under the
tree, which was just heavy with blossoms, said spontaneously, "Last year that tree
was humming with bees." Now there was one bumblebee on it. The small nascent
bees and other little bee types are absolutely missing. Near that tree I've
got acres of dandelions and you cannot find one of the native pollinators. And
it's not just the honeybees; it's other pollinators like moths and butterflies.
In many ways, their loss is probably more alarming or indicative of a deep
problem.
PETTIS: We rely on honeybees for agriculture because we can move them in
large numbers. And we know how to manage them. But the National Academy of
Sciences recently published a study that showed that all pollinators -- which rely on
a diversity of flowers -- are in decline. Whether it's urbanization, habitat
fragmentation, or an increase in agricultural land use, something is severely
impacting the native pollinators.
Colony collapse disorder was reported by commercial beekeepers. Is it also
happening to bees in the wild?
PETTIS: There's very few places where we actually monitor the feral
population. I know of a group in Texas that was following some wild populations of
bees, and a Cornell researcher has found a group around Ithaca, New York. But it's
often hard to sample those bees. We know that wild bee populations were
decimated by parasitic varroa mites over time, and they've rebounded, probably due
to natural selection for natural resistance. But I'm not familiar with data
coming in from feral populations.
McDONALD: A few years ago, in a very remote part of the state, I found
thriving bee populations that I assumed were feral. To help them along, I set up
bait boxes and put in anti-mite strips. I slipped them in seed oil and made
little puddles so the bees had to walk through the oil in this experiment I called
"remote medication." But as the summer went on, the bees collapsed in spite of
my attempts to help them. The feral population is just getting so hard hit
that I suspect it's virtually gone by now.
Are scientists looking at how the climate affects the bees' favorite flowers
and food sources?
ESAIAS: That's a good question. Most of the nectar sources in Maryland, my
state, come from trees -- tulip poplar, black locus, and holly trees. There has
been a great deal of research on plants and increased CO2 and warming. I tried
to find out how temperatures would affect blooming dates, and there is
virtually no information in the literature on how temperature affects blooming dates
of our trees and how increased CO2 concentrations affect blooming dates.
There's lots of research that says it makes plants grow faster, and some of them,
like poison ivy, become more toxic. But ecologists in general have not paid
attention to the timing of blooming and nectar availability and quality of
pollen.
McDONALD: That is so true. The only number that I go on is that an apple tree
will bloom after 40 days in 40-degree temperatures. That boils down that
simple formula.
ESAIAS: As a kind of a climatologist, I'm getting paid to study the impact of
potential global warming scenarios on our ecology. There's a lot of research
being done on carbon cycling, but without information about when the plants
bloom and how the quality of the flora changes, we are in a poor position to
asses the effect of changes in temperature and rainfall on our ecosystems.
Can bees survive climate changes?
MUSSEN: I can tell you that beekeepers take their honeybees north to the
upper Canadian border and all the way down to the equator. If they're warm, they
cool themselves by evaporating water, and if they're cold, they heat themselves
by sucking up a little bit of extra carbohydrate and rattling their muscles.
So they're great adapters?
MUSSEN: They're going to handle it. The honeybees are not the ones I'm
concerned about. I think Wayne will back me up on this: Historians have said that
thousands of years ago, there were some pretty nasty fluctuations in the earth's
weather. And through this period of time, we became and continue to be very
good farmers. But for whatever reason, we are beginning to kind of move into a
cycle where we are going to find more extremes than we used to have. The
droughts may be hotter and longer, the storms and floods may be more severe. Things
aren't going to be so nice in the future. But again, I think the honeybees
are more likely to handle that as long as they've got some food available to
them. But with some of these other pollinators, which we rely upon to keep the
environment going for us, well, if they get knocked around too much by the
weather, then that's going to be really consequential.
What do you think the disappearance of the bees teaches us about ecology?
ESAIAS: If I can go back to what Eric was saying, I too don't doubt the
survivability of the honeybee. On average, it's going to do fine. But what we are
dealing with now is a series of local effects. That doesn't mean we aren't
going to see an average global increase of temperature in the future, if you
believe the predictions.
What does it tell us about our native pollinators and ecology? That's such an
exceedingly complex question that I don't know. It just puts me in awe of
earth's complexity. If you ask scientists to predict what global warming will do
to an ecosystem, and they don't throw up their hands and say, "Beats me," then
it shows we have a lot of work to do to understand the complexity and
responses of all of these insect and plant interactions, when they occur, and will
they get out of phase.
McDONALD: I think there is a cautionary tale here. Look at the progenitors of
the maize, the corn which was developed in Mexico. It took a long time for
environmental researchers to find the original plant because as the maize became
dependent upon cultivation, a lot of those genes from the wild corn had died
off. There used to be 1,000 small meat-packing plants, and if a problem arose
at one, it was not particularly important to the other 999. But now with all
these together as one vast factory, any problem that arises has instant
implications everywhere. We're at the mercy of assembly-line farming and high-speed
distribution, and maybe no accountability as far as the quality of the food.
But I don't know how you do it. How do you get more people to go back to smaller
farms? It's practically utopian to bring that up anymore.
It's amazing that an esoteric subject like beekeeping has erupted in the mass
media. Do you think that's been beneficial?
ESAIAS: I think the media coverage is wonderful. I think we are facing a
series of problems like this, problems that are environmental in nature, and this
has been a real eye-opener for me as to how poorly prepared this country and
countries around the world are in taking note of how climate change or global
change will impact our ecosystems. Humanity is affecting our ecosystems, and
it's very complex to determine whether this is due to environmental change or
some disease. You can see now that it is very difficult to pull these things
apart.
McDONALD: The media has done a very good job of telling all sides. But the
problem is, how do you motivate people to change the way they are? Where I live,
I try to live pretty low on the food chain and avoid the temptation of most
of the things that people have. People are just incredible consumers and
runners of fuel and buyers of gadgets. How do you change that? It's as if there's an
ethical or a moral blank spot there. I don't like to preach, but it's pretty
obvious: When you're killing the corn belt by growing fuel to run SUVs,
there's a very bad disconnect somewhere along the line.
MUSSEN: Bees are a necessary part of our food production. If we don't grow
our own cherries and apples, can't we just buy them somewhere else? The answer
is yes. But do we want to become as dependent on foreign nations for our food
as we are dependent on them for fuel? I would certainly hope the answer is no.
I believe that the amount of food we exported to other countries last year was
less than the amount of food we imported for our consumption. We use to be
the breadbasket of the world. Now we're just one of the breadbaskets.
McDONALD: The basket case.
MUSSEN: [Laughs.] So to keep our industry healthy, we certainly have to keep
our pollinators healthy.
In the end, are we the people the ultimate cause of the bees' collapse?
PETTIS: We're the ultimate cause in that we've changed the planet to suit our
needs. We're running it to suit our needs and not the benefit of all the
organisms around us. Honeybees aren't totally domesticated, but we have tried to
domesticate them. We've tried to make bees more gentle and make more honey. In
enhancing certain traits, we make the bees more susceptible to other things.
Do you think the bees will be back?
PETTIS: I do. I don't think we've gone that far in domesticating them. The
bee population is very diverse and can withstand an onslaught of different
things -- including beekeepers.
Research assistance by Jonathan Vanian
Buzz kill
Preparing my back-porch beehive is my favorite rite of spring, but this year
my flock mysteriously went missing. I'll miss more than just the honey.
By Novella Carpenter
March 13, 2007 |
Bee! I'm expecting you!
Was saying yesterday
To someone you know
That you were due.
The frogs got home last week,
Are settled, and at work;
Birds, mostly back,
The clover warm and thick.
You'll get my letter by
The seventeenth; reply
Or better, be with me,
Yours, Fly.
-- Emily Dickinson
Spring arrived here in Oakland, Calif., and I didn't even notice until the
police busted a _marijuana_ (http://dir.salon.com/topics/marijuana/index.htmlr)
-filled warehouse across the street. I was in my garden -- raised vegetable
beds in an abandoned lot in the bad part of town -- picking grass and clover for
my rabbits, when I heard pounding on the warehouse's metal roll door. Ten
black-and-white squad cars screeched up, some emblazoned with the words "Canine
Unit." I watched awhile -- the door came up cautiously, the police inched
closer -- until, out of the corner of my eye, I was distracted by the most
beautiful peach blossoms. Decorating the parking strip between my garden and the just-r
aided drug warehouse, the blooms were frilly and deep pink, and would have
made a good tattoo.
Then I noticed other trees. A weeping Santa Rosa plum, branches like
dreadlocks woven with white buds. A three-way grafted apple, each of its girlish
pink-and-white blooms promising fruit, a different variety on every branch. Even
the eucalyptus across the street, shading the police, was adorned by thousands
of filamenty flowers.
All those blooms, but no honeybees.
Like commercial and backyard beekeepers _in 22 states_
(http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7006579930) around the nation, I recently opened up my
beehive for spring inspection, only to discover that my hairy herd had gone
missing. For years, the beehive has presided over the deck off my apartment, and
the bees bobbed in and out, loaded down with pollen baskets and nectar collected
in my garden and in the weedy debris of nearby abandoned lots. But now,
nothing.
They left behind no forwarding address nor clues to their whereabouts, and
there were no corpses cluttering the hive for my amateur forensic inspection. My
flock had simply wandered elsewhere, and likely perished. Bee researchers and
scientists at the Department of Agriculture have christened this unexpected
bee holocaust _Colony Collapse Disorder_
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder) and hypothesize that the die-off could be a result of
either a fungus, a nicotine-based pesticide, or a virus. (They're working on it.)
But in the meantime, CCD could very well spell commercial disaster: for almond
farmers whose trees won't be pollinated, for consumers who may face a shortage
of apples and peaches and cherries because there are no bees to turn flower
into fruit. While my livelihood may not depend on it, as the mistress of one
hive on one porch in Oakland, the loss still came with an intense pang of grief,
like a death in the family.
When a beekeeper dies, the bees must be informed. I learned this tradition a
few years ago, while visiting _Slovenia's Apicultural Museum._
(http://www.bf.uni-lj.si/jbozic/muzej/muzej.html) One of the exhibits was a short film. My
mother and I watched as a grandfather trained a lederhosen-wearing boy to be a
beekeeper. Shot entirely in golden late afternoon light, it was a bittersweet
story, and near the end of the film the grandpa died. A final scene showed the
boy hunkered near the hive, his lips moving in a whisper. I knew the boy
would have felt the heat of the hive, generated by so many thousands of bees, and
that it would have smelled like wax and _propolis_
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propolis) -- a rich ambrosial aroma. The bees whining through the box
would have sounded like a wail. How consoling that act would be in the face of
death.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Back then I hadn't yet experienced the loss of a hive -- I was too engrossed
in the joyful part. Like installing new packages of bees -- one of life's
greatest pleasures. The last one I got, the one that has now died, arrived at the
Oakland post office three years ago.
When I pedaled up to retrieve my flock, a few lonely, feral honeybees hovered
around the post office. It was April in Northern California, arguably the
loveliest month of the year. The postmistress seemed unnerved by their arrival,
but admitted she wouldn't mind some honey, if I got the chance. This was
Oakland, not Mayberry -- but I nodded and promised anyway. My bike had a basket
attached to the front and the humming package fit perfectly inside. As I rode down
Telegraph Avenue, I laughed out loud at the bees that trailed us through the
traffic and stoplights.
My first colony was a birthday gift, from my beau, Billy, while we were
living in Seattle. He loaded me into the car and took me to a small beekeeping shop
in the middle of the woods. He promised me a beehive with all the fixings: a
smoker, a veil and cap, long, thick gloves, a hive tool, boxes to add as the
colony grew, a starter book ("First Lessons in Beekeeping") and a small wire
box filled with 3,000 bees and one queen suspended in her own chamber.
I don't have children, but that day I experienced a glimmer of what it must
feel like to return from the hospital with a newborn. As we pulled our Dodge
Dart away from the forest of Christmas trees, I wondered if I could handle such
responsibility. What if I dropped the box? What if they grew up and decided to
swarm, or to abandon me? But also, to be honest, I was thinking about getting
stung. A lot.
Even if you've been stung before (when I was 12 I stumbled through a
yellow-jacket nest and received more than 25 stings), as a beginning beekeeper you
worry about your first sting. We're choosing to get stung. It feels a bit
transgressive. It certainly seemed so to my next-door neighbor.
"You should move to the country," Trudy said when she saw my buzzing shoe
box. She was out on her lawn, trimming the grass with a pair of scissors. Next to
her lawn was our raised parking strip garden, a chaotic jumble of tall stalks
of fava beans, lettuces and Swiss chard. Most city ordinances allow
beekeeping if there is adequate distance from the hive to any neighboring structures.
Since we planned to house the hive on our upstairs deck, we were within that
legal boundary. And so I marched upstairs to our deck clutching the bee package,
hoping I looked like I knew what I was doing.
I put on as much clothing as possible. Triple shirts; a mechanic's jumpsuit;
several pairs of socks, hiked up and tucked into my pants; heavy-duty fabric
beekeeping gloves (regretting I hadn't bought the more expensive leather ones),
and finally, my veil. Swaddled as I was, I could barely put down my arms.
The sun was going down, that lovely April day. I set up the hive to face due
east so it would get early morning sun. Installing the bees later in the day
avoids confusing them, for they like to spend at least a night in their hive
before venturing out. I pried the lid off the bee package and, as instructed,
tilted the opening toward the fresh hive body, with its orderly rows of frames
just waiting to be filled with honey.
The bees fell out like a liquid, spilling into the box without incident. The
bearish man who'd sold them to me had demonstrated how to tap the box out --
like a ketchup bottle -- which I did to get the last of the stragglers. Because
of my fear and the sheer volume of my clothing, I had a slick of sweat
dripping down my back. But my terror was unfounded: The bees were entirely docile.
Finally, out of the then mostly empty box, I fished out the queen chamber. A
few bees, her attendants, clung to the sides. At the bottom was a stopper plug
made of candy. The idea is that the workers will eventually chew through the
sugary plug and release the queen. But I wanted to see her. So, against proper
bee protocol, I popped the candy inward with the end of my hive tool -- and
out she emerged. Her ass was enormous; she looked like some kind of exotic
beetle. I held her on the top of the new hive, and she strutted across. Was it
just me, or did she actually have the gallant air of royalty? Then she was gone,
down into her chambers where she would lay all the eggs to keep the hive
going.
Most of us carry around a pack of defining moments. Beginning that colony on
a gentle spring day is one of my fondest. I received one sting: on my wedding
finger.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Six years later, I've made room for a honey extractor in our living room. And
each year during prime honey-extracting season -- late summer -- I invite
friends over for a sticky party. In preparation, the night before we place a "bee
escape" under the super, the box where the honey is stored. The escape allows
the bees trapped in the box to flee through narrow tunnels, but prevents them
from returning to the box once they've left.
After 12 hours, the entire box of honey is bee-free, and we take it to the
kitchen. The super looks like a bottomless dresser drawer, except inside,
instead of socks, 10 frames are crammed side by side, lined up like library books.
Inside each one, a Bible-size chunk of sealed honeycomb hangs suspended in the
rectangular frame. We spin the extractor and centrifugal force splatters the
honey on the stainless steel sides, where it drips down and collects at the
bottom. Most "real" beekeepers use an extractor with a motor, heaters and
filters. But our guests simply steady the hand-spun extractor (which has a tendency
to keel over), and crank it as hard as they can. Then they open the valve at
the bottom and let the honey dribble out into quart-size Mason jars.
At these gatherings, everyone gets covered in honey, and we eat as much in
one sitting as we can bear. The harvest is different every year, and the flavor
of the honey can even vary from frame to frame. If a frame appears darker in
color, we'll spin and bottle it separately. One year the honey tasted like
licorice -- was it from the wild fennel filling so many abandoned lots? Another
frame held eucalyptus honey, which had a medicinal taste to it. A different
time, the honey was so sweet, it hurt. But no matter how it tastes, the experience
always makes everyone involved feel richer for it -- charmed, elated, sated.
Afterward, when I return the honey super to the hive, the bees are always
more apt to sting, and they seem, well, upset. That's why beekeepers call it
robbing the hive. But bees don't organize a block watch or call the police; they
simply get back to doing what they do, which is to salvage any remaining honey
and wax and clean up the now mostly empty frames. I take, they give.
But this spring will be different. My honeybees won't pollinate my fruit
trees. There'll be no sticky party this summer. My home will seem empty without
their comings and goings. I'll even miss their stings.
In Slovenia, you're supposed to tell a hive when the beekeeper dies, but what
are you supposed to do when it's the bees that have left you? Should I
console myself and whisper into the hive, "It's spring. I'm expecting you." Lean
into its warmth and whine, breathe in the scent of that insect cathedral? Maybe.
But the box is as cold as winter now, and there's nothing inside to receive
the news.
Laurie Davies Adams
Executive Director
Coevolution Institute
423 Washington St. 5th
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 362 1137
LDA at coevolution.org
_http://www.coevolution.org/_ (http://www.coevolution.org/)
_http://www.pollinator.org/_ (http://www.pollinator.org/)
_http://www.nappc.org/_ (http://www.nappc.org/)
Bee Ready for National Pollinator Week: June 24-30, 2007. Contact us
for more information at www.pollinator.org
Our future flies on the wings of pollinators.
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/pollinator/attachments/20070529/afd1048f/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 8647 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/pollinator/attachments/20070529/afd1048f/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the Pollinator
mailing list