[Pollinator] Bird and bat collisions continue to perplex researchers
Ladadams at aol.com
Ladadams at aol.com
Thu Aug 13 13:06:20 PDT 2009
WIND POWER: Bird and bat collisions continue to perplex researchers
(Thursday, August 13, 2009)
Scott Streater, special to E&E
A group of leading scientists and wind power experts has joined forces to
find out why so many birds and bats are struck down each year by wind
turbines and what can be done about it.
Their task has urgency. In the next five years, thousands of wind turbines
are projected to be built across the country, thanks to federal tax
credits, grants and loans meant to expand renewable energy sources and the
environmentally friendly power they produce.
But wind power has a decidedly unfriendly environmental side to it, with
already existing wind farms estimated by some researchers to kill tens of
thousands of birds and bats each year.
Thirty researchers recently gathered at a meeting co-hosted by Cornell
University to identify key areas where more research is needed. Many of the
research questions are basic -- such as better understanding the migration
patterns of birds and bats -- underscoring how little is known about why birds
and bats are drawn to spinning wind turbines.
"We don't know enough right now to know how big of a concern it is,
frankly," said Michael Burger, conservation and science director for Audubon New
York and an ecologist at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. "This group thinks
it's very important to figure that out, and then apply what we learn as
wind power develops in this country to make it as green as possible."
The issue highlights perhaps the biggest obstacle to the commerical-scale
expansion of wind power: finding suitable places to site wind turbines that
can tower 240 feet high.
Some renewable energy projects, particularly proposals for solar power on
federal land in Southern California, have met stiff resistance from
environmentalists concerned about the effects to wildlife habitat. Wildlife issues
have already caused problems for wind farms in south-central Wyoming,
where concerns about impacts to sage grouse habitat have prompted at least one
company to put the brakes on a 300-megawatt wind farm (_Land Letter_
(http://www.eenews.net/Landletter/2009/08/06/1/) , Aug. 6).
Studies show that wind energy has the potential to supply as much as 20
percent of the country's energy needs. But in order to do that, millions of
wind turbines would need to be built, with the greatest concentrations
stretching from Texas to Oregon. The Bureau of Land Management already has a
sizeable backlog of wind-power project applications in Western states and as
many as 200 locations have been identified by developers for site testing of
wind projects.
"That portends a huge, massive expansion of wind development," said
Douglas Johnson, a research statistician and senior scientist at the U.S.
Geological Survey's Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center and a member of the
coalition.
"They're going to be all over the place," Johnson added. "If you're
putting up a dozen of them it probably doesn't matter so much where you site
them. But if you're putting up thousands of them, then a little bit of
difference multiplied by thousands can add up to a substantial difference."
Dearth of information
No one is sure exactly how many birds and bats are killed each year when
struck by wind turbines. But experts believe the number is very high.
Albert Manville, a wildlife ecologist with the Fish and Wildlife Service's
division of migratory bird management, has estimated that as many as
440,000 birds are killed by existing wind turbines each year (_Land Letter_
(http://www.eenews.net/Landletter/2009/02/05/1/) , Feb. 5). A September 2007
report, commissioned by the Wildlife Society and written by Manville and other
leading experts, concluded that wind energy's negative impacts are often
overlooked in the rush to expand renewable energy.
"There is a dearth of information on which to base decisions regarding
siting of wind energy facilities, their impacts on wildlife, and possible
mitigation strategies," the report stated.
One problem is that there are no federal regulations governing the siting
of wind farms with respect to birds and bats. Rather, such decisions are
based on voluntary industry guidelines devised by FWS in 2002, and developers
are not always required to complete pre-project analyses of bird and bat
impacts.
But some things are well known, including the fact that billions of birds
migrate across the United States each year using "the same wind currents
that are most beneficial for producing wind energy," Andrew Farnsworth, a
postdoctoral research associate at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and a member
of the coalition, said in a statement.
That is important, Farnsworth said, because those wind currents can be
very specific within a region. "We know that in some locations a small
percentage of wind turbines may cause the majority of bird and bat deaths,"
Farnsworth said. "As wind power develops further, we need to know more about how
placement, design and operation impact birds and bats as well as how
habitat and weather conditions affect potential hazards."
Possible solutions
Ongoing research by FWS and the American Wind Energy Association, however,
holds promise for reducing the estimated tens of thousands of bat
mortalities caused by wind turbines each year.
The research shows that slowing turbine blades at night, when the wind
speed are lowest but bats are most active, can cut mortalities by as much as 73
percent (_Land Letter_ (http://www.eenews.net/Landletter/2009/05/28/7/) ,
May 28). "That's something that looks very promising," said Johnson, the
USGS senior scientist.
Still, experts say more research is needed. One approach suggested by the
coalition is to use radar to track bird migration patterns. More
bird-pattern studies are also necessary, they say, to compare the effects of wind
farms before and after they are built.
"Conducting this research will help the wind industry make informed,
science-based decisions about where future wind energy projects can be built and
how they can be operated to minimize the impact on migrating wildlife,
while still providing much-needed alternative energy," said John Fitzpatrick,
director of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
Scott Streater is a freelance journalist based in Colorado Springs, Colo.
Want to read more stories like this?
_Click here_ (http://www.eenews.net/trial/) to start a free trial to E&E
-- the best way to track policy and markets.
Laurie Davies Adams
Executive Director
Pollinator Partnership
423 Washington Street, 5th floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-362-1137
LDA at pollinator.org
_www.pollinator.org_ (http://www.pollinator.org/)
_www.nappc.org_ (http://www.nappc.org/)
National Pollinator Week is June 21-27, 2010.
Beecome involved at _www.pollinator.org_ (http://www.pollinator.org/)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/pollinator/attachments/20090813/88817464/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Pollinator
mailing list