[HECnet] Multinet Mail
Kurt Hamm
kurt at hamm.me
Thu Jun 6 13:25:52 PDT 2019
This is what my ipnet location shows. Is it MLTCFG.TSK?
Kurt
Directory DU0:[IPNET]
6-JUN-2019 16:19
INS.CMD;172 2. 27-JUN-2018 12:32
INSHECNET.CMD;1 2. 10-JAN-2018 05:47
INS.NEW;208 2. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPNET.NEW;106 2. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPNET.CMD;208 5. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.OBJ;208 13. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTNET.TSK;209 16. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTCOM.TSK;208 14. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTCOM.STB;208 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
MLTCFG.TSK;208 18. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPLN.DAT;208 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.DAT;208 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPDF.MAC;208 2. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IPNCONFIG.CMD;106 4. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.TSK;197 3. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
IP.STB;197 1. 11-JAN-2019 03:13
Total of 87./87. blocks in 16. files
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:13 PM Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
> Well, my point was just that ethernet is a better local networking than
> point-to-point multinet links. But of course multinet links also works.
>
> And I remember wrong. All the multinet stuff for RSX is under [IPNET]
>
> Johnny
>
> On 2019-06-06 21:26, Kurt Hamm wrote:
> > I am looking in IP and there isn't anything for MNC.
> >
> > In terms of topology, I currently have two 3900s, Larry and Moe. Larry
> > is configured for the connection to HECNet. Moe is configured (decnet
> > over IP) to connect to Larry. This seems to work with both servers
> > being able to set host and see files on HECNet.
> >
> > My idea was that I could have the PDP-11 (Frodo) point to Larry as well
> > via DECNet over IP.
> >
> > Is this what you are describing?
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> >
> > Directory DU0:[IP]
> > 6-JUN-2019 15:09
> >
> > NTPDATE.TSK;210 63. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > NTPDATRES.TSK;210 42. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > MAILD.TSK;123 237. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > PCL.TSK;210 63. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > PCLRES.TSK;213 33. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > IFDRV.TSK;213 7. C 13-JAN-2019 14:47
> > IPDRV.TSK;213 14. C 13-JAN-2019 14:47
> > UDDRV.TSK;213 16. C 13-JAN-2019 14:48
> > TCDRV.TSK;213 35. C 13-JAN-2019 14:48
> > IFCONFIG.TSK;424 37. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > NETSTAT.TSK;424 23. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > PING.TSK;424 64. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > TRACERT.TSK;424 16. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > ETHACP.TSK;424 25. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > RESACP.TSK;424 24. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > RMD.TSK;400 217. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > DHCP.TSK;409 67. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > DHCPRES.TSK;409 45. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > RWHOD.TSK;396 15. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > TFTPD.TSK;396 64. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > INETD.TSK;409 12. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > SPOOF.TSK;409 12. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > WWW.TSK;409 117. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > WWWRES.TSK;409 94. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > IRCBOT.TSK;409 66. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > FTPD.TSK;409 62. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > TELNETD.TSK;408 26. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > TELNET.TSK;408 41. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > TFTP.TSK;394 106. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > IRC.TSK;408 72. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > IRCRES.TSK;395 46. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > FTP.TSK;409 67. C 11-JAN-2019 03:13
> > TELCOM.TSK;402 3. C 13-JAN-2019 14:48
> >
> > Total of 1831./1831. blocks in 33. files
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:17 PM Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
> > <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
> >
> > If you have my TCP/IP installed, and you have generated DECnet with
> the
> > Multinet lines, then things should be pretty easy. MNC might not be
> > installed, but MNC.TSK should be in [IP], so just install it then.
> >
> > However, do you really have all your DECnet machines on separate
> > ethernets? Otherwise I would really recommend that you have DECnet on
> > your local ethernet, and just have one machine which is the router to
> > the outside from the ethernet segment. Individual point-to-point
> links
> > will not be as efficient as the ethernet.
> >
> > Johnny
> >
> > On 2019-06-06 21:09, Kurt Hamm wrote:
> > > New issue. I am working to setup my (Oscar) PiDP-11 on HECNet
> > > (Decnet). The docs say that I need to run MNC to setup the links
> > for
> > > DECNet, but I can't find that application anywhere. I am
> > assuming that,
> > > for the PiDP-11, NETGEN and IPNET have been completed. I just
> > need to
> > > configure my circuits and make sure the PiDP-11 has the correct
> > area.node.
> > >
> > > RSX-11M+ newbie, so sorry if I am missing something basic.
> > >
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:53 PM Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
> > <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>
> > > <mailto:bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2019-06-06 15:04, Kurt Hamm wrote:
> > > > I wasn't sure where to post this question, so I thought I
> > would
> > > start here.
> > > >
> > > > I have two simh vax3900 machines. Larry and Moe. Larry
> > is the
> > > HECNet
> > > > router for Moe.
> > > >
> > > > When I send email from Larry (via SMTP), the _return _email
> > > address is
> > > > correct (SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>
> > > <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>>
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>
> > > <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at LARRY.MYDOMAIN.COM>>>.
> > > >
> > > > When I send email from Moe (to
> > LARRY::SMTP%"user at domain.com <mailto:user at domain.com>
> > > <mailto:user at domain.com <mailto:user at domain.com>>
> > > > <mailto:user at domain.com <mailto:user at domain.com>
> > <mailto:user at domain.com <mailto:user at domain.com>>>"), the return
> > > email address is:
> > > > SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>
> > > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>>
> > > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>
> > > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM
> > <mailto:SYSTEM at SCSSYSTEMID.MYDOMAIN.COM>>>.
> > > >
> > > > Why is Moe using the SCSSYSTEMID instead of the system
> name?
> > > >
> > > > *I am missing something.*
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how you should do a setup of mail relaying in
> VMS.
> > >
> > > However, you can always send from Moe to MIM::user at domain.com
> > <mailto:MIM%3A%3Auser at domain.com>
> > > <mailto:MIM%3A%3Auser at domain.com
> > <mailto:MIM%253A%253Auser at domain.com>>. Those
> > > mails should then get correct addresses.
> > >
> > > Johnny
> > >
> > > --
> > > Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> > > || on a psychedelic trip
> > > email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>
> > <mailto:bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> ||
> > > Reading murder books
> > > pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" -
> > B. Idol
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> > || on a psychedelic trip
> > email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se> ||
> > Reading murder books
> > pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> >
>
> --
> Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
> || on a psychedelic trip
> email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
> pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20190606/93c6de2e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Hecnet-list
mailing list