[HECnet] Is this the most up to date version of DECnet OS numbers?

[Thomas DeBellis]

Heh...  I wouldn't consider it a bug; I'd say it's more of a misfeature: 
RSX is flagging an occasional malformed LAT packet by running out of memory.

Oh, /OK/; perhaps the reporting paradigm (going catatonic) could be 
enhanced...

Of course, that begs the question of whether I'm being like most 
reasonable people, being reasonable at all, or just plain being silly...  😁

On 11/8/21 5:20 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 11/8/21 4:49 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>> Just as a warning, the lat implementation have some bugs. I've never 
>> spent the time to figure it out, but at least when talking to RSX 
>> hosts, it triggers some bug in RSX which cause it to leak memory, and 
>> eventually RSX becomes catatonic.
>
>   I think most reasonable people would consider that a bug in RSX, not 
> a bug in the Linux LAT implementation. ;)
>
>              -Dave
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/hecnet-list/attachments/20211110/b22ce1b2/attachment-0001.htm>