[Pollinator] Recent articles - copies available

[Graham Pyke]

Pyke, G.H., 2016. Floral Nectar: Pollinator Attraction or Manipulation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.013

Abstract:

The literature suggests that floral nectar acts principally to attract pollinator visitation (and/or revisitation), thereby enhancing plant reproductive success. However, floral nectar also manipulates pollinator behaviour during and immediately following plant visits,
affecting pollen transfer, and plant reproduction. I argue that floral nectar should really be viewed as a pollinator manipulant rather
than attractant, thus potentially explaining why its concentration is not generally high and why it decreases with increasing pollinator
body size. Otherwise, such patterns may remain mysterious and unexplained.


Pyke, G.H., 2016. Plant–pollinator co-evolution: It's time to reconnect with Optimal Foraging Theory and Evolutionarily Stable Strategies. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution & Systematics 19, 70-76.

Abstract:

Pollination syndromes (correlations between floral and pollinator traits), have long interested ecologists, but remain inadequately explained. For example, plant species pollinated by relatively large animals cannot have evolved correspondingly high rates of nectar-energy production simply because such animals need relatively more energy; evolution does not work that way. The inverse correlation between pollinator body-size and nectar concentration is similarly difficult to explain.

To remedy this, I propose that Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) and the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy approach (ESS) be combined and applied to pollination syndromes. Both hypothesise that, through evolution, average biological fitness of individuals has been maximised. OFT predicts foraging consequences for pollinators varying in body size, and other attributes, allowing the ESS approach to be applied to co-adapted plant–pollinator traits. This should lead to predicted relationships between plants and their pollinators.

The steps involved in this process are conceptually straightforward, but empirically difficult, which may explain why the approach has been very little pursued in the past. However such difficulties can be overcome, thus pointing to the future.

We surely need to understand pollination systems, in order to conserve and manage them. It is therefore time to reconnect OFT and plant–pollinator co-evolution, within the general ESS approach, and hence increasing our understanding of pollination syndromes and other plant–pollinator relationships.

Dr Graham H. Pyke
Distinguished Professor
School of Life Sciences
University of Technology Sydney
e: Graham.Pyke at uts.edu.au<mailto:Graham.Pyke at uts.edu.au>

Co-founder (with Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University) of UTS-based Sustainability Central
Website: http://sustainabilitycentral.com.au

Facebook page: Sustainability Central
Twitter: @sustaincentral

Partner with Prof Paul Ehrlich’s Stanford-based Millennium Alliance for Humanity & the Biosphere
Website: MAHB.stanford.edu



UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or
attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the
sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the University of Technology Sydney.
Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.

Think. Green. Do.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sonic.net/pipermail/pollinator/attachments/20160405/a2cc2c31/attachment.html>